Who ever translated the first option doesnt know what the hell they're translating. What the hell does energy have to do with selling emission?



The way I see it, is the first option should be pro selling emission but thats not how it come off.

No, the first option is against emission trade.

Well, in Germany companies causing heavy pollution must trade with emission certificates. Those who are over a limit, must by them, those who are under the limit, can sell them. I am not sute if that is known in other countries?

And may anyone else check the translation please?

I have heard, that american energy companies resp. utility companies are surging the american government to create laws which enables us-companies also to be engaged in this "business". Exhaust gas desulfurisation (sulfur removal) is a basic investment, which runs in Germany since mid eighties and Holds/makes the air really cleaner.
Emission trading is one way to get back the invested millions dollars in antipollution activities from other national or international companies.
As I know Barack Obama has also signalized someting in this direction.
Come on, americans. Give Barrack a chance! First of all, you will benefit from this voting. OK, the world will profit more from Obama as president!

Obama for president!!

Well I voted for the first one because I thought it was suppose to be FOR emission trading, is there a way I can get it changed to one thats FOR it?

Sorry, unfortunately not. All decisions are for technical reasons irreversible.